Based on the design criteria, describe the tradeoff that must be made when choosing one of the three designs. Use the graph to support your argument.

Answer 1

The trade-off that must be made when choosing one of the three designs is between cost and efficiency. Design 1 is the cheapest alternative as it requires the least amount of material and manufacturing time. However, it also has the lowest efficiency as it generates the least amount of power. On the other hand, Design 3 is the most effective as it generates the most power, but it is also the most expensive alternative as it requires the most material and manufacturing time.

Design 2 falls in the middle, with moderate efficiency and cost. Therefore, the trade-off is between cost and efficiency, and the decision depends on the priorities of the project. If the project's main objective is to minimize costs, then Design 1 would be the best option. If the goal is to maximize efficiency regardless of cost, then Design 3 would be the ideal option. If the project requires a balance between cost and efficiency, then Design 2 would be the best alternative. The graph shows that Cost decreases as Efficiency decreases, and as Efficiency increases, Cost increases.