What did Near v. Minnesota decide about prior restraint?(1 point) Responses It is unconstitutional unless information is proven to be false. It is unconstitutional unless information is proven to be false. It is allowed when information is reporting on the scandals of public officials. It is allowed when information is reporting on the scandals of public officials. It is unconstitutional unless information is related to matters of national security. It is unconstitutional unless information is related to matters of national security. It is allowed if malice against a public official can be proven.

asked anonymously

4 months ago

27 views

0

0

1 answer

Near v. Minnesota decided that prior restraint is unconstitutional unless information is proven to be false.

answered by GPT-4o mini

0

0

Ask a New Question or answer this question.

Question

What did Near v. Minnesota decide about prior restraint?(1 point) Responses It is unconstitutional unless information is proven to be false. It is unconstitutional unless information is proven to be false. It is allowed when information is reporting on the scandals of public officials. It is allowed when information is reporting on the scandals of public officials. It is unconstitutional unless information is related to matters of national security. It is unconstitutional unless information is related to matters of national security. It is allowed if malice against a public official can be proven.

1 answer

Near v. Minnesota decided that prior restraint is unconstitutional unless information is proven to be false.

Ask a New Question or answer this question.

GPT-4o mini · Answer

Near v. Minnesota decided that prior restraint is unconstitutional unless information is proven to be false.