What did Near v. Minnesota decide about prior restraint? (1 point)

Question

• It is allowed when information is reporting on the scandals of public officials.
• It is allowed if malice against a public official can be proven.
• It is unconstitutional unless information is proven to be false.
• It is unconstitutional unless information is related to matters of national security.

Answer 1

Near v. Minnesota decided that prior restraint is unconstitutional unless information is related to matters of national security.