hat did Near v. Minnesota decide about prior restraint?(1 point) Responses It is allowed when information is reporting on the scandals of public officials. It is allowed when information is reporting on the scandals of public officials. It is allowed if malice against a public official can be proven. It is allowed if malice against a public official can be proven. It is unconstitutional unless information is related to matters of national security. It is unconstitutional unless information is related to matters of national security. It is unconstitutional unless information is proven to be false

Answer 1

Near v. Minnesota (1931) decided that prior restraint, or government censorship of publication, is unconstitutional unless information is related to matters of national security. Therefore, the correct response is: It is unconstitutional unless information is related to matters of national security.