To determine which of the given quadratic equations can be solved by grouping, we need to find an equation where we can factor it into the form \((x + p)(x + q) = 0\) or similar, where the product of \(p\) and \(q\) equals the constant term and their sum equals the coefficient of the \(x\) term.
Let's analyze each equation:
-
\(x^2 + 10x + 21 = 0\):
- Factors as \((x + 3)(x + 7) = 0\). This can be solved by factoring but not typically by grouping as there are no two pairs being grouped.
-
\(x^2 - 12x + 18 = 0\):
- Factors as \((x - 6)^2 - 18 = 0\); can be solved by completing the square or quadratic formula, but not grouping.
-
\(x^2 - 4x - 8 = 0\):
- To apply grouping, rewrite as \(x^2 - 4x + 4 - 8 = 0\).
- This can be transformed into \( (x - 2)^2 - 12 = 0\), but does not lend itself to simple grouping.
-
\(x^2 + 8x - 22 = 0\):
- Rearranging or looking for factors, it does not lend itself to simple integer factoring that would fit grouping.
To identify an equation that can be solved through grouping, we generally look for a factorable trinomial where the middle term can be split into two parts.
None of the quadratics listed have coefficients that clearly allow them to be grouped for solutions.
However, commonly quadratic equations of the form \(ax^2 + bx + c = 0\) can be solved if \(b\) can break into two rational parts.
If we focus purely on the methodology of grouping:
We can't derive definitive solutions from what's above simply based on grouping. However, most mathematically typical form is yielding:
- \(x^2 - 4x - 8 = 0\) is rearrangeable, though it’s not typical for simple grouping compared to others, it can be manipulated to some forms leading to solutions.
So if asked simply to choose which can be attempted with some creative manipulation:
The best option to choose would be(though ideally not simple solving by standard grouping): \(x^2 - 4x - 8 = 0\).
If the intention is to have pure grouping without any special transformations, it’s fair to assume no are entirely suitable for classic grouping approach.
In conclusion, while quad. like \(x^2 + 10x + 21\) is simple volunteer grouping by interests of straight factoring, go with typical exploratory of the \(x^2 + 10x + 21\) if forced choice.
Re-clarifying, please adjust if category strictly fits definition options for grouping as need --- but assess through classic group splitting capacities, none are strongly suited for grouping thus in final determination:=
\(x^2 - 4x - 8 = 0\) as best potential if aiming for even flexibilities at group explorative or transformations.