Asked by MS
Q: If y=sinx/(1+tanx), find value of x not greater than pi, corresponding to maxima or minima value of y. I have proceeded thus-
Equating dy/dx=0 we get{ (1+tanx)cosx-sinx.sec^2 x}/(1+tanx)^2=0……..(A)
Or cosx+sinx=sinx.sec^2 x or cosx= sinx.sec^2-sinx
Or cosx=sinx.tan^2 x=sinx.sin^2 x/cos^2 x
Or cos^3 x=sin^3 x hence cosx=sinx=pi/4. Since working out II DC is very tedious, I have reasoned that to check the sign of second DC, sign of Nr of dy/dx( i.e. A) can be checked since its denominator i.e. (1+tanx)^2 and its DC i.e. sec^2 x are always +ve. Hence,
DC of Nr of (A)= -sinx+cosx-{cosx.sec^2 x+sinx.2sec^2 x.tanx}
= -sinx+cosx-secx-2tanx/cos^2 x
At x=pi/4, it is = -2/sqrt2 + 1/sqrt2 - sqrt2- 2/2= -2sqrt2 + 1/sqrt2 -1
= (-3-sqrt2)/sqrt2 which is negative, hence x=pi/4 is maxima point. Answers are correct but,
1. Is my reasoning correct?
2. If sign of expression for II DC in general is –ve, but for a particular value of x its value is +ve, will it correspond to maxima or minima?
Equating dy/dx=0 we get{ (1+tanx)cosx-sinx.sec^2 x}/(1+tanx)^2=0……..(A)
Or cosx+sinx=sinx.sec^2 x or cosx= sinx.sec^2-sinx
Or cosx=sinx.tan^2 x=sinx.sin^2 x/cos^2 x
Or cos^3 x=sin^3 x hence cosx=sinx=pi/4. Since working out II DC is very tedious, I have reasoned that to check the sign of second DC, sign of Nr of dy/dx( i.e. A) can be checked since its denominator i.e. (1+tanx)^2 and its DC i.e. sec^2 x are always +ve. Hence,
DC of Nr of (A)= -sinx+cosx-{cosx.sec^2 x+sinx.2sec^2 x.tanx}
= -sinx+cosx-secx-2tanx/cos^2 x
At x=pi/4, it is = -2/sqrt2 + 1/sqrt2 - sqrt2- 2/2= -2sqrt2 + 1/sqrt2 -1
= (-3-sqrt2)/sqrt2 which is negative, hence x=pi/4 is maxima point. Answers are correct but,
1. Is my reasoning correct?
2. If sign of expression for II DC in general is –ve, but for a particular value of x its value is +ve, will it correspond to maxima or minima?
Answers
Answered by
Steve
From what I can decipher from your cryptic use use of arcana (like A, II DC, Nr, etc.) your reasoning appears sound. I have a bit of trouble distinguishing between II DC and second DC. If they are the same, how can you check the sign of second DC without calculating it?
If y'(a)=0, and y' goes from positive to negative at x=a, then it is a maximum, since y has stopped rising it starts to fall there.
The sign of y" indicates concavity, so if y'=0 and y" < 0, it is a maximum.
If y'(a)=0, and y' goes from positive to negative at x=a, then it is a maximum, since y has stopped rising it starts to fall there.
The sign of y" indicates concavity, so if y'=0 and y" < 0, it is a maximum.
Answered by
MS
Thanks for reply. Sorry for confusion. Second and II DC are same and only mean second diff. coeff. or derivative d^2y/dx^2. Nr is numerator and A is dy/dx as shown as equation(A)in the first line of answer.
What I meant was that for calculating second DC we have to apply quotient formula in which denominator and its DC will always be +ve. Can't the sign of rest of the expression determine the sign of the second DC, without the need for working it out fully?
For second part, I wondered if in some case I get an extrema at x= -5 by putting dy/dx=0 and second DC is -x, then is it max, or can it be a min as value of second DC at x=-5 will be +5.
What I meant was that for calculating second DC we have to apply quotient formula in which denominator and its DC will always be +ve. Can't the sign of rest of the expression determine the sign of the second DC, without the need for working it out fully?
For second part, I wondered if in some case I get an extrema at x= -5 by putting dy/dx=0 and second DC is -x, then is it max, or can it be a min as value of second DC at x=-5 will be +5.
Answered by
Steve
Your function becomes less unwieldy if you note that if you divide top and bottom by cosx, you have
y = (1/2 sin2x)/(sinx+cosx)
All those nasty sec^2 and stuff go away and you have
2nd: wolframalpha.com is your friend. Enter
2nd derivative sinx/(1+tanx)
and it pops right up.
If, as you propose, y'(-5)=0 and y" = -x, then y" > 0 and so y is concave up, making it a minimum at x = -5.
y = (1/2 sin2x)/(sinx+cosx)
All those nasty sec^2 and stuff go away and you have
2nd: wolframalpha.com is your friend. Enter
2nd derivative sinx/(1+tanx)
and it pops right up.
If, as you propose, y'(-5)=0 and y" = -x, then y" > 0 and so y is concave up, making it a minimum at x = -5.
Answered by
MS
Thank you very much for this valuable guidance.
Answered by
Very Anonymous
where's my senpaii reiny?
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.