In 4 complete sentences, compare and contrast the arguments made by the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists at the Constitutional Convention about the benefits and problems of a strong central government. made by a 15 year old and short.

Answer 1

Federalists argued that a strong central government was necessary to maintain order and stability across the states, ensuring that the nation could effectively address issues like defense and trade. They believed that a unified government could prevent the chaos and disunity that had occurred under the Articles of Confederation. On the other hand, Anti-Federalists feared that a strong central government would lead to tyranny and take away individual freedoms, arguing that state governments should have more power to protect citizens’ rights. Overall, Federalists saw a strong government as a way to unite and strengthen the country, while Anti-Federalists prioritized the protection of personal liberties and state sovereignty.

Answer 2

can you make it shorter?

Answer 3

Federalists believed a strong central government was essential for national stability and effective governance, addressing issues like defense and trade. In contrast, Anti-Federalists feared that such power would lead to tyranny and threaten individual freedoms, advocating for greater state control. While Federalists saw strong central authority as a unifying force, Anti-Federalists prioritized protecting personal liberties and state sovereignty.