In a paragraph, compare and contrast the arguments made by the arguments made by the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists at the Constitutional Convention about the benefits and problems of a strong central government.

Answer 1

During the Constitutional Convention, Federalists and Anti-Federalists presented contrasting arguments regarding the role of a strong central government. Federalists, such as Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, advocated for a robust national government, arguing that it was essential for maintaining order, providing national defense, and fostering economic stability through a unified framework. They believed that a strong central authority could effectively manage conflicts between states and ensure the protection of individual liberties. Conversely, Anti-Federalists, including Patrick Henry and George Mason, raised concerns over the potential for tyranny and the erosion of state sovereignty. They argued that a powerful central government could become oppressive, infringing on the rights of citizens and disregarding the needs of local communities. The Anti-Federalists championed the idea of preserving individual rights through a Bill of Rights and preferred a confederation that allowed for more localized governance. Ultimately, the debate highlighted the tension between the need for an effective government and the desire to protect individual freedoms and local autonomy.