In a paragraph, compare and contrast the arguments made by the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists at the Constitutional Convention about the benefits and problems of a strong central government.

Answer 1

At the Constitutional Convention, Federalists and Anti-Federalists presented contrasting views on the merits and risks of a strong central government. Federalists, such as Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, argued that a robust national government was essential for maintaining order, promoting economic stability, and effectively managing conflicts between states. They believed that a centralized authority could provide the necessary structure to support a unified nation, prevent factionalism, and safeguard against foreign threats. In contrast, Anti-Federalists like Patrick Henry and George Mason warned of the dangers posed by a strong central government, fearing it would lead to tyranny and the erosion of individual liberties. They contended that local governance was more responsive to the people's needs and that too much power consolidated at the federal level could undermine states' rights and personal freedoms. Ultimately, this debate highlighted the tension between the need for national cohesion and the desire to protect individual liberties and local governance.