The advantage of using a primary source when investigating a historical event is that primary sources provide an eyewitness account of an event. This direct connection to the event allows researchers to gain insights into the perspectives, emotions, and experiences of those who lived through it, offering a richer understanding of the context surrounding the event.
If someone were to investigate a historical event, what advantage would using a primary source give them?(1 point) Responses Primary sources are subjected to peer review. Primary sources are subjected to peer review. Primary sources provide an eyewitness account of an event. Primary sources provide an eyewitness account of an event. Primary sources never conflict with one another. Primary sources never conflict with one another. Primary sources are the most accurate.
1 answer