If someone were to investigate a historical event, what advantage would using a primary source give them?(1 point) Responses Primary sources never conflict with one another. Primary sources never conflict with one another. Primary sources are subjected to peer review. Primary sources are subjected to peer review. Primary sources are the most accurate. Primary sources are the most accurate. Primary sources provide an eyewitness account of an event.

Answer 1

The advantage of using a primary source when investigating a historical event is that primary sources provide an eyewitness account of an event. This allows researchers to gain direct insights and personal perspectives from those who experienced the event firsthand, which can offer valuable context and details that secondary sources may lack.