If someone were to investigate a historical event, what advantage would using a primary source give them?(1 point)

Question

Responses

Primary sources provide an eyewitness account of an event.
Primary sources provide an eyewitness account of an event.

Primary sources are subjected to peer review.
Primary sources are subjected to peer review.

Primary sources are the most accurate.
Primary sources are the most accurate.

Primary sources never conflict with one another.

Answer 1

The correct advantage of using a primary source in investigating a historical event would be:

Primary sources provide an eyewitness account of an event.

This response highlights the value of primary sources as they offer direct, original evidence from individuals who experienced or witnessed the event firsthand, providing unique insights into the context and details of the event. The other responses do not accurately represent the nature of primary sources.