The most effective method for a biologist to get other scientists to accept a new argument regarding adaptations in frogs would be to provide evidence to support the argument. Evidence is crucial in scientific discourse as it allows other scientists to evaluate, replicate, and validate the claims made. While conducting experiments and generating testable questions are important parts of the scientific process, the need to present solid evidence is paramount for gaining acceptance of a new argument.
If a biologist wants other scientists to accept a new argument regarding adaptations in frogs, what would be the most effective method for doing so?(1 point) Responses provide evidence to support the argument provide evidence to support the argument write a paper outlining known information about frogs write a paper outlining known information about frogs conduct an experiment to study the argument conduct an experiment to study the argument generate a testable question to learn more about the adaptation
1 answer