The most effective method for a biologist to have other scientists accept a new argument regarding adaptations in frogs would be to provide evidence to support the argument. This is crucial because scientific acceptance relies heavily on empirical data and evidence. While generating a testable question and conducting experiments are also important steps in the scientific process, presenting solid evidence is the most direct way to persuade others of the validity of a new argument.
If a biologist wants other scientists to accept a new argument regarding adaptations in frogs, what would be the most effective method for doing so?(1 point)
Responses
write a paper outlining known information about frogs
write a paper outlining known information about frogs
generate a testable question to learn more about the adaptation
generate a testable question to learn more about the adaptation
provide evidence to support the argument
provide evidence to support the argument
conduct an experiment to study the argument
1 answer