The most effective method for a biologist to have other scientists accept a new argument regarding adaptations in frogs would be to provide evidence to support the argument. This is because scientific acceptance is primarily based on empirical evidence and data that validate the claims being made. While generating testable questions, writing a paper, or conducting experiments are all valuable steps in the scientific process, presenting strong supporting evidence is crucial for persuading others to accept a new argument.
If a biologist wants other scientists to accept a new argument regarding adaptations in frogs, what would be the most effective method for doing so?(1 point)
Responses
provide evidence to support the argument
provide evidence to support the argument
generate a testable question to learn more about the adaptation
generate a testable question to learn more about the adaptation
write a paper outlining known information about frogs
write a paper outlining known information about frogs
conduct an experiment to study the argument
conduct an experiment to study the argument
1 answer