During the abolitionist movement in the 19th century, activists employed different strategies to fight against slavery. How did the approaches of William Lloyd Garrison differ from those of Frederick Douglass?(4 points)

Question

a. Garrison focused on moral persuasion and publishing anti-slavery literature, while Douglass also engaged in political activism and supported working within the political system.
b. Garrison advocated for violent uprisings against slaveholders, while Douglass believed in peaceful protest and legal reform.
c. Garrison believed in maintaining the Union at all costs to end slavery, while Douglass argued for the dissolution of the Union if it meant achieving abolition.
d. Garrison supported immediate emancipation without compensation to slave owners, while Douglass initially supported gradual emancipation and compensation.

Answer 1

The correct answer is:

a. Garrison focused on moral persuasion and publishing anti-slavery literature, while Douglass also engaged in political activism and supported working within the political system.

William Lloyd Garrison was known for his moral and philosophical stance against slavery, prominently through his writings, particularly in his newspaper, "The Liberator." He advocated for immediate emancipation without compromise and often focused on the moral imperative to end slavery. Frederick Douglass, on the other hand, while also advocating for immediate emancipation, took a more pragmatic approach, which included engaging in political activism, speaking at rallies, and supporting reforms through the political system.