William Lloyd Garrison and Frederick Douglass were both prominent figures in the abolitionist movement, but they had different approaches and philosophies regarding the struggle against slavery. Here are the key differences between their strategies:
-
Philosophical Approach to the Union: Garrison believed in maintaining the Union at all costs to end slavery, while Douglass argued for the dissolution of the Union if it meant achieving abolition.
-
Methods of Advocacy: Garrison focused on moral persuasion and publishing anti-slavery literature, while Douglass also engaged in political activism and supported working within the political system.
-
Views on Violent Resistance: Garrison advocated for violent uprisings against slaveholders, while Douglass believed in peaceful protest and legal reform.
-
Emancipation Perspectives: Garrison supported immediate emancipation without compensation to slave owners, while Douglass initially supported gradual emancipation and compensation.
These differences highlight the diverse strategies within the abolitionist movement, reflecting a range of beliefs about how best to achieve freedom for enslaved individuals.