¿Cómo es? Portfolio Rubric

Question

SPANISH I A
Directions: Use the rubric below as a guide in writing and revising your ¿Cómo es? portfolio.
Criteria
(Weight)
Excellent (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Poor (1) Points Awarded
Ideas/Purpose
(× 1)
The main idea or
purpose is
clearly stated.
The description is
fully relevant.
The description
strongly
supports the
main idea or
purpose.
The main idea or
purpose is
stated.
The description is
generally
relevant.
The description
mostly supports
the main idea or
purpose.
The main idea or
purpose may be
unclear.
The description is
somewhat
relevant.
The description
provides basic
support for the
main idea or
purpose.
The main idea or
purpose is
unclear.
The description
has little or no
relevance.
Organization
(× 1)
There is a clear
and effective
organizational
structure.
The introduction
and conclusion
are effective.
Ideas are
organized
logically.
There is an
organizational
structure.
The introduction
and conclusion
are adequate.
Ideas are
organized
logically, though
a few ideas may
be out of place.
The
organizational
structure is
inconsistent.
The introduction
and conclusion
are weak or not
present.
Some ideas are
extraneous or out
of place.
There is little or
no organizational
structure.
There is no
introduction or
conclusion.
Ideas are limited
or extraneous.
© 2014 Connections Education LLC. All rights reserved.
Criteria
(Weight)
Excellent (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Poor (1) Points Awarded
Voice
(× 1)
There is a clear,
natural voice that
fully engages the
reader.
The voice is
mostly natural
and engages the
reader.
The voice is
inconsistent, or
there are some
instances in
which the voice is
not natural.
There are few
instances in
which the voice is
natural or
engaging.
Word Choice
(× 1)
The vocabulary is
clearly
appropriate for
the audience and
purpose.
Words are used
effectively.
Writing is rich
with a variety of
academic and
domain-specific
words.
The vocabulary is
generally
appropriate for
the audience and
purpose.
Most words are
used effectively.
Writing shows an
adequate use of
academic and
domain-specific
words.
The vocabulary is
somewhat
appropriate for
the audience and
purpose.
The word choice
is weak or
ineffective.
Writing shows a
weak use of
academic and
domain-specific
words.
The vocabulary
may not be
appropriate for
the audience or
purpose.
There are
multiple errors
in word choice.
Writing shows
limited or no
use of academic
or domain�specific words.
Sentence
Fluency
(× 1)
Sentence
structure is
varied.
Sentences flow
smoothly.
A variety of
transitions is
used.
Sentence
structure is
generally
varied.
Most sentences
flow smoothly.
There is some
variety of
transitions.
Sentence
structure is
somewhat
varied.
Some sentences
are choppy or do
not flow.
There is little
variety of
transitions.
Sentence
structure has
little or no
variance.
Sentences are
often choppy or
do not flow.
There are few or
no transitions.
© 2014 Connections Education LLC. All rights reserved. 2
Criteria
(Weight)
Excellent (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Poor (1) Points Awarded
Conventions
(× 2)
There is a strong
command of
conventions.
Punctuation,
capitalization,
and spelling are
consistently
correct.
There is a
general
command of
conventions.
Punctuation,
capitalization,
and spelling are
mostly correct.
There is a partial
command of
conventions.
Punctuation,
capitalization,
and spelling are
inconsistent or
weak.
Errors in
conventions may
occasionally
interfere with
meaning.
There is a
limited
command of
conventions.
Punctuation and
capitalization are
mostly
incorrect.
There are
multiple errors
in spelling.
Errors in
conventions
often interfere
with meaning.
Opinion
(× 1)
An opinion is
clearly stated.
The opinion is
fully and
effectively
supported by a
variety of
relevant facts.
An opinion is
stated.
The opinion is
adequately
supported by
facts, though a
few may be
loosely
connected.
The opinion may
be unclear.
The opinion is
somewhat
supported by
facts; some facts
may be
unrelated.
The opinion is
unclear.
The opinion is
supported by
few or no
relevant facts.
© 2014 Connections Education LLC. All rights reserved. 3
Criteria
(Weight)
Excellent (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Poor (1) Points Awarded
Comprehension
(× 1)
The description
shows a strong
understanding of
the unit theme.
The description
shows an
adequate
understanding of
the unit theme.
The description
shows basic
understanding of
the unit theme.
The description
shows a limited
understanding of
the unit theme.
Presentation
(× 1)
The presentation
is clearly
appropriate to
the task,
purpose, and
audience.
The presentation
is generally
appropriate to
the task,
purpose, and
audience.
The presentation
is somewhat
appropriate to
the task,
purpose, and
audience.
The presentation
may not be
appropriate to
the task,
purpose, or
audience.
0 points: No evidence of ability to demonstrate targeted skill.
Total points: /40
Comments
© 2014 Connections Education LLC. All rights reserved.

Answer 1

La rúbrica que has compartido es una guía detallada para evaluar un portafolio en el curso de Español I A bajo el tema "¿Cómo es?". A continuación, te ofrezco un resumen de los criterios de evaluación, con una breve descripción de cada categoría:

Criterios de Evaluación

1. Ideas/Purpose (1 punto)

   • Evalúa la claridad y relevancia de la idea principal. Se observa si la descripción apoya efectivamente la idea central.

2. Organization (1 punto)

   • Se revisa la estructura organizativa del portafolio, considerando la presencia de una introducción y conclusión efectivas, así como la lógica en el orden de las ideas.

3. Voice (1 punto)

   • Examina la naturalidad y capacidad del texto para atraer al lector. Se busca consistencia en la voz del autor.

4. Word Choice (1 punto)

   • Analiza la elección de palabras y si el vocabulario es adecuado para la audiencia y el propósito del trabajo. Incluye el uso de palabras específicas del ámbito académico.

5. Sentence Fluency (1 punto)

   • Evalúa la variedad en la estructura de las oraciones y la fluidez del texto, así como la diversidad en el uso de transiciones entre ideas.

6. Conventions (2 puntos)

   • Mide el dominio de las convenciones gramaticales, incluyendo puntuación, capitalización y ortografía. Se considera si los errores afectan la comprensión.

7. Opinion (1 punto)

   • Determina si la opinión del autor está claramente expuesta y si está respaldada por hechos relevantes y variados.

8. Comprehension (1 punto)

   • Mide el grado de entendimiento del tema de la unidad, reflejado en la descripción proporcionada.

9. Presentation (1 punto)

   • Evalúa si la presentación es adecuada en relación con la tarea, propósito y audiencia.

Puntuación Total

• Cada criterio tiene asignada una puntuación específica, y los puntos se suman para obtener un total de hasta 40 puntos. Se consideran comentarios adjuntos para ofrecer retroalimentación adicional.

Uso de la Rúbrica

Esta rúbrica es útil no solo para los evaluadores, sino también para los estudiantes que deseen autoevaluarse y revisar su trabajo. Al revisar cada categoría, los estudiantes pueden identificar áreas de mejora y asegurarse de que su portafolio cumpla con los estándares establecidos.