Asked by Student
One half-cell of a concentration cell consists of a silver wire dipping into a 1.00 M solution of Ag+. The second half-cell consists of a silver electrode in a solution containing an unknown concentration of Ag+. The measured cell potential was determined as 226 mV at 25°C. Calculate the molarity of Ag+ in the unknown solution to 3 significant figures.
Answers
Answered by
DrBob222
E(cell) = Eo - (0.0592/n)log(dil/concd)
Does the problem give any information to tell you which way the electrons are flowing? If not, all I know to do is to work it both ways; i.e., we don't know which solution is the more concentrated. IF we assume the concn of the unknown is less (often the known is made to be 1 M), then we substitute
0.226 for Ecell
0 for Eo
n = 1
dil we will call the x value
concd we will call 1 M.
Solve for x, the concn of the more dilute solution.
NOW, you can reverse that if you wish and recalculate x (making dil 1 and concd in the denominator x) and solve for x and compare the two values. One will be realistic and the other will not. Post your work if you get stuck. I worked the problem and my answer was 1.52 x 10^-4 M (the other value was 6750 M if I reversed the numbers). Clearly, 6750 M is not very realistic. Check my thinking. Check my arithmetic.
Does the problem give any information to tell you which way the electrons are flowing? If not, all I know to do is to work it both ways; i.e., we don't know which solution is the more concentrated. IF we assume the concn of the unknown is less (often the known is made to be 1 M), then we substitute
0.226 for Ecell
0 for Eo
n = 1
dil we will call the x value
concd we will call 1 M.
Solve for x, the concn of the more dilute solution.
NOW, you can reverse that if you wish and recalculate x (making dil 1 and concd in the denominator x) and solve for x and compare the two values. One will be realistic and the other will not. Post your work if you get stuck. I worked the problem and my answer was 1.52 x 10^-4 M (the other value was 6750 M if I reversed the numbers). Clearly, 6750 M is not very realistic. Check my thinking. Check my arithmetic.
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.