Asked by Leslie
Was concerned about the effectiveness of the high-flow nebulizers and the mist tent.
1. This is a fragment that is missing a subject.
2. This is a run-on that requires a semicolon after effectiveness.
3. This is a runn-on that requires a comma and a conjunction.
4. This is a run-on that needs to be separated into two independent clauses.
5. The sentence is fine as it is.
Answer:
#1 - missing a subject (who was concerned)
The sentence needs something in front of WAS - ex. I was or He was -etc.
The above sentence is just bad English!
Thanks - all for tonight/today -
going to finish watching VAN-NSH hockey
1. This is a fragment that is missing a subject.
2. This is a run-on that requires a semicolon after effectiveness.
3. This is a runn-on that requires a comma and a conjunction.
4. This is a run-on that needs to be separated into two independent clauses.
5. The sentence is fine as it is.
Answer:
#1 - missing a subject (who was concerned)
The sentence needs something in front of WAS - ex. I was or He was -etc.
The above sentence is just bad English!
Thanks - all for tonight/today -
going to finish watching VAN-NSH hockey
Answers
Answered by
Writeacher
#1 is correct. Good for you!
Answered by
SraJMcGin
Right you are!
Sra
Sra
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.