Why were districts in South Carolina's lowcountry smaller compared to those in the backcountry?

Question

The lowcountry had a higher population than the backcountry.
The lowcountry had a smaller population than the backcountry.
The backcountry had more political power than the lowcountry.
The lowcountry had more political power than the backcountry.

Answer 1

The reason districts in South Carolina's lowcountry were smaller compared to those in the backcountry is primarily because the lowcountry had a higher population than the backcountry. This higher population density necessitated smaller districts to ensure proper representation. As a result, the lowcountry, with its more populous areas, had more districts compared to the backcountry, which had a lower population density. Therefore, the correct answer is:

The lowcountry had a higher population than the backcountry.