Question
Why were districts in South Carolina's lowcountry smaller compared to those in the backcountry? (1 point) Responses  The lowcountry had a higher population than the backcountry. The lowcountry had a higher population than the backcountry.  The lowcountry had a smaller population than the backcountry. The lowcountry had a smaller population than the backcountry.  The backcountry had more political power than the lowcountry. The backcountry had more political power than the lowcountry.  The lowcountry had more political power than the backcountry.
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The correct response is: **The lowcountry had a higher population than the backcountry.**
This is because the lowcountry, with its more developed plantation economy and greater concentration of people, required smaller districts to adequately represent the interests of its larger population. In contrast, the backcountry had a lower population density, which allowed for larger districts.
This is because the lowcountry, with its more developed plantation economy and greater concentration of people, required smaller districts to adequately represent the interests of its larger population. In contrast, the backcountry had a lower population density, which allowed for larger districts.
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!