Question

The annexation of Hawaii in 1898 was a complicated situation involving important issues like imperialism, economics, national security, and cultural identity. Supporters of the annexation believed that it was necessary for the United States to expand its influence in the Pacific Ocean, especially to strengthen military positions and boost economic interests in industries like sugar and pineapple. In 1893, Queen Liliʻuokalani was overthrown by American planters with the support of the U.S. government, which made it easier for the U.S. to annex Hawaii. They thought this was important for American security and economic stability, especially during the Spanish-American War.

However, the annexation raises serious moral questions because it disrupted Hawaii’s sovereignty and the right of its people to govern themselves. Many see the overthrow of the monarchy and the subsequent annexation as acts of imperialism that ignored the unique culture and independence of the Hawaiian people. Today, people continue to discuss the lasting effects of this event, including issues related to self-determination, land rights, and preserving Hawaiian culture. The conflict between the United States’ economic interests and Hawaiian identity shows that the annexation was more about exercising power than forming a true partnership. There is a growing call for recognizing the rights and voices of the Native Hawaiian community in understanding this important part of history.

put it in 7 sentences

Answer 1

The annexation of Hawaii in 1898 was driven by complex factors, including imperialism, economics, and national security. Supporters argued that expanding U.S. influence in the Pacific was vital for military positioning and economic interests, particularly in the sugar and pineapple industries. The U.S. government aided American planters in the 1893 overthrow of Queen Liliʻuokalani, facilitating the annexation amid the backdrop of the Spanish-American War. However, this act raises significant moral concerns regarding the disruption of Hawaii’s sovereignty and the right of its people to self-govern. Many view the overthrow and subsequent annexation as imperialism that disregarded the unique culture and independence of the Hawaiian population. Ongoing discussions focus on the lasting impacts of these events, particularly concerning self-determination, land rights, and cultural preservation. The conflict between U.S. economic interests and Hawaiian identity highlights that the annexation was more about power than partnership, leading to calls for recognition of Native Hawaiian rights and voices in history.