Question

The annexation of Hawaii in 1898 represents a complex intersection of imperialism, economics, national security, and cultural identity. Proponents of the annexation argued that it was essential for the U.S. to expand its influence in the Pacific, particularly for strategic military purposes and economic interests in the sugar and pineapple industries. The overthrow of Queen Liliʻuokalani in 1893 by American planters, supported by the U.S. government, paved the way for annexation, emphasizing the perceived need for American security and economic stability during events like the Spanish-American War.

However, the ethical implications of this annexation raise significant moral questions, as it fundamentally disrupted Hawaii’s sovereignty and the rights of its people to govern themselves. The forceful removal of the monarchy and the subsequent annexation are seen by many as acts of imperialism that disregarded the rich culture and autonomy of the Hawaiian people. Ongoing discussions today focus on the lasting effects of this historical event, including issues of self-determination, land rights, and cultural preservation. The tension between U.S. economic interests and Hawaiian identity highlights the need for a deeper understanding of this history, suggesting that the annexation was more a matter of imperial power than genuine partnership, and calling for acknowledgment of the rights and voices of the Native Hawaiian community.

can you make it sound as an 8th grader

Answer 1

The annexation of Hawaii in 1898 was a complicated situation involving important issues like imperialism, economics, national security, and cultural identity. Supporters of the annexation believed that it was necessary for the United States to expand its influence in the Pacific Ocean, especially to strengthen military positions and boost economic interests in industries like sugar and pineapple. In 1893, Queen Liliʻuokalani was overthrown by American planters with the support of the U.S. government, which made it easier for the U.S. to annex Hawaii. They thought this was important for American security and economic stability, especially during the Spanish-American War.

However, the annexation raises serious moral questions because it disrupted Hawaii’s sovereignty and the right of its people to govern themselves. Many see the overthrow of the monarchy and the subsequent annexation as acts of imperialism that ignored the unique culture and independence of the Hawaiian people. Today, people continue to discuss the lasting effects of this event, including issues related to self-determination, land rights, and preserving Hawaiian culture. The conflict between the United States’ economic interests and Hawaiian identity shows that the annexation was more about exercising power than forming a true partnership. There is a growing call for recognizing the rights and voices of the Native Hawaiian community in understanding this important part of history.