To accurately compare the two passages, I would need more context or specific content from both "To Play or Not to Play" by Jon Hoang and "Video Game Scholarships" by Katie Jones. However, based on the options provided, you can assess how the two passages differ based on their focus and the issues they address.
If one passage focuses on pros while the other focuses on cons, that might indicate a difference in perspective regarding gaming scholarships. If one discusses mental health while the other talks about physical health, that would show a difference in the angle of the discussion.
To choose the correct option, you would need to identify which passage discusses pros and cons, as well as mental versus physical health issues. If you have the content of the passages, I can help analyze them directly!