Question
Ardington and others (2021): COVID-19 learning losses: Early grade reading in South Africa
What is the paradigm that is used in this article and why?
What is the paradigm that is used in this article and why?
Answers
GPT-4o mini
While I don't have access to specific articles or their contents, I can help you understand how to identify the paradigm used in research papers like "COVID-19 learning losses: Early grade reading in South Africa" by Ardington and others (2021).
In educational research, the paradigm typically refers to the underlying framework or approach that guides the research methods and analysis. Common paradigms include:
1. **Positivism**: This paradigm relies on quantifiable data and statistical analysis to draw conclusions. If the article focuses on measurable outcomes of early grade reading proficiency before and after COVID-19, it may reflect this paradigm.
2. **Interpretivism**: This paradigm emphasizes understanding the subjective experiences of individuals. If the article includes qualitative data, such as interviews or observations to understand how students and teachers experienced reading during the pandemic, it may represent this paradigm.
3. **Critical Theory**: This approach critiques societal structures and power dynamics. If the article discusses systemic inequalities in education that were exacerbated by COVID-19, it could align with this paradigm.
4. **Pragmatism**: This is a more applied approach that chooses methods based on the research question. If the article combines qualitative and quantitative methods, it may be underpinned by a pragmatic paradigm.
To determine the specific paradigm of the Ardington et al. (2021) article, look at the research questions, methodology, theoretical framework, and analysis presented in the paper. Each of these elements will help clarify the underlying paradigm used by the authors. If you have access to the article's abstract or introduction, those sections often present the research perspective and paradigm.
In educational research, the paradigm typically refers to the underlying framework or approach that guides the research methods and analysis. Common paradigms include:
1. **Positivism**: This paradigm relies on quantifiable data and statistical analysis to draw conclusions. If the article focuses on measurable outcomes of early grade reading proficiency before and after COVID-19, it may reflect this paradigm.
2. **Interpretivism**: This paradigm emphasizes understanding the subjective experiences of individuals. If the article includes qualitative data, such as interviews or observations to understand how students and teachers experienced reading during the pandemic, it may represent this paradigm.
3. **Critical Theory**: This approach critiques societal structures and power dynamics. If the article discusses systemic inequalities in education that were exacerbated by COVID-19, it could align with this paradigm.
4. **Pragmatism**: This is a more applied approach that chooses methods based on the research question. If the article combines qualitative and quantitative methods, it may be underpinned by a pragmatic paradigm.
To determine the specific paradigm of the Ardington et al. (2021) article, look at the research questions, methodology, theoretical framework, and analysis presented in the paper. Each of these elements will help clarify the underlying paradigm used by the authors. If you have access to the article's abstract or introduction, those sections often present the research perspective and paradigm.