To determine which statement is true, we need to analyze each option based on the information provided.
-
Option a: In the interval from point A to point B, the object travels 30 m.
- This statement can be true, but we need more information about the distance between these points.
-
Option b: In the interval from point C to point D, the object travels 0 m.
- This means the object does not move between point C and point D. This could only be true if point C and point D are the same point, resulting in 0 distance traveled. This is plausible.
-
Option c: In the interval from point B to point C, the object travels 30 m.
- Similar to option a, this could also be true depending on the distance between these points.
-
Option d: In the interval from point A to point D, the object travels 11 m.
- This statement could also be valid, depending again on the overall distances involved.
With the limited information provided and assuming the object moves continuously from A to D, the only option that definitively could hold true in all cases is option b, as it states that no distance is traveled between C and D, which can occur if C and D are coincident.
However, without information on the specific distances or positions of points A, B, C, and D, one could argue that more than one statement might seem plausible.
Given the context, we can assert that option b is the most universally valid statement based on the possibility of object travel described.
1 answer