Use the paragraph to answer the question.

A mining company hires a team of scientists to research how their mines impact local wildlife. They are not happy with the results, so they wait a few years to publish. They do not include the name of their company in the publication. The language is vague and some findings are omitted. The results are published online, not in a scientific journal.

When evaluating this information, which is most concerning?

(1 point)
Responses

publication date
publication date

publication type
publication type

authorship
authorship

reliability

1 answer

The most concerning aspect when evaluating this information is authorship. The mining company did not include their name in the publication, and the results were published online rather than in a reputable scientific journal. This raises questions about the credibility and transparency of the research.

Similar Questions
  1. Use the paragraph to answer the question.A mining company hires a team of scientists to research how their mines impact local
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  2. Use the paragraph to answer the question.A mining company hires a team of scientists to research how their mines impact local
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  3. Use the paragraph to answer the question.A mining company hires a team of scientists to research how their mines impact local
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  4. Use the paragraph to answer the question.A mining company hires a team of scientists to research how their mines impact local
    1. answers icon 1 answer
more similar questions