Use the paragraph to answer the question.

A mining company hires a team of scientists to research how their mines impact local wildlife. They are not happy with the results, so they wait a few years to publish. They do not include the name of their company in the publication. The language is vague and some findings are omitted. The results are published online, not in a scientific journal.

When evaluating this information, which is most concerning?

(1 point)
Responses

authorship
authorship

publication type
publication type

reliability
reliability

publication date
publication date

1 answer

The most concerning aspect when evaluating this information is reliability. The lack of transparency regarding the authorship and potential bias due to the company's influence, along with the vague language and omission of findings, raises significant questions about the trustworthiness and accuracy of the research. Additionally, the choice to publish online rather than in a scientific journal further undermines the credibility of the results.

Similar Questions
  1. Use the paragraph to answer the question.A mining company hires a team of scientists to research how their mines impact local
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  2. Use the paragraph to answer the question.A mining company hires a team of scientists to research how their mines impact local
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  3. Use the paragraph to answer the question.A mining company hires a team of scientists to research how their mines impact local
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  4. Use the paragraph to answer the question.A mining company hires a team of scientists to research how their mines impact local
    1. answers icon 1 answer
more similar questions