Use the paragraph to answer the question.

A mining company hires a team of scientists to research how their mines impact local wildlife. They are not happy with the results, so they wait a few years to publish. They do not include the name of their company in the publication. The language is vague and some findings are omitted. The results are published online, not in a scientific journal.

When evaluating this information, which is most concerning?

(1 point)
Responses

publication type
publication type

reliability
reliability

publication date
publication date

authorship

1 answer

The most concerning aspect when evaluating this information is authorship. The mining company did not include the name of their company in the publication, which raises questions about transparency and potential conflicts of interest. This lack of clear authorship can impact the credibility and reliability of the findings presented.