Asked by A bot
Izzie is trying to solve this inequality: 3(t+1)−4t≥−5
After she solves it, she shows it to you and asks you if she did it correctly.
This is the work she completed:
Step 1: 3t+3−4t≥−5
Step 2: −t+3≥−5
Step 3: −t≥−2
Step 4: t≤2
(12 points)
The correct answer should have been t≤8
Izzie made a mistake going from step 2 to step 3
Izzie made a mistake going from step 3 to step 4
Izzie should not have changed the inequality symbol from ≥
to ≤
Izzie made a mistake going from step 1 to step 2
Izzie made no mistakes in solving this inequality
After she solves it, she shows it to you and asks you if she did it correctly.
This is the work she completed:
Step 1: 3t+3−4t≥−5
Step 2: −t+3≥−5
Step 3: −t≥−2
Step 4: t≤2
(12 points)
The correct answer should have been t≤8
Izzie made a mistake going from step 2 to step 3
Izzie made a mistake going from step 3 to step 4
Izzie should not have changed the inequality symbol from ≥
to ≤
Izzie made a mistake going from step 1 to step 2
Izzie made no mistakes in solving this inequality
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
Let's review Izzie's steps and see if she made any mistakes while solving the inequality.
The original inequality is:
\[ 3(t+1) - 4t \geq -5 \]
### Step 1
Distributing the 3:
\[ 3t + 3 - 4t \geq -5 \]
This step is correct.
### Step 2
Combining like terms:
\[ -t + 3 \geq -5 \]
This step is also correct.
### Step 3
Now, to isolate \( t \), Izzie subtracts 3 from both sides:
\[ -t \geq -5 - 3 \]
\[ -t \geq -8 \]
This means Izzie's Step 3 is incorrect. Instead of \( -2 \), she should have \( -8 \).
### Step 4
In this step, when she multiplied both sides by -1, she incorrectly changed the direction of the inequality:
From:
\[ -t \geq -8 \]
to:
\[ t \leq 8 \]
This step directly matches the correct inequality conclusion.
To summarize:
1. Izzie made a mistake from Step 2 to Step 3 where she combined the numbers incorrectly.
2. The final answer after fixing the steps should lead to \( t \leq 8 \) which Izzie did arrive at, but she had an error in the process.
### Conclusion:
The correct evaluation is **Izzie made a mistake going from step 2 to step 3.**
The original inequality is:
\[ 3(t+1) - 4t \geq -5 \]
### Step 1
Distributing the 3:
\[ 3t + 3 - 4t \geq -5 \]
This step is correct.
### Step 2
Combining like terms:
\[ -t + 3 \geq -5 \]
This step is also correct.
### Step 3
Now, to isolate \( t \), Izzie subtracts 3 from both sides:
\[ -t \geq -5 - 3 \]
\[ -t \geq -8 \]
This means Izzie's Step 3 is incorrect. Instead of \( -2 \), she should have \( -8 \).
### Step 4
In this step, when she multiplied both sides by -1, she incorrectly changed the direction of the inequality:
From:
\[ -t \geq -8 \]
to:
\[ t \leq 8 \]
This step directly matches the correct inequality conclusion.
To summarize:
1. Izzie made a mistake from Step 2 to Step 3 where she combined the numbers incorrectly.
2. The final answer after fixing the steps should lead to \( t \leq 8 \) which Izzie did arrive at, but she had an error in the process.
### Conclusion:
The correct evaluation is **Izzie made a mistake going from step 2 to step 3.**