Let's analyze Izzie's work step by step:
-
Step 1: \( 3(t + 1) - 4t \geq -5 \) simplifies to \( 3t + 3 - 4t \geq -5 \). This is correct and simplifies to \( -t + 3 \geq -5 \).
-
Step 2: This matches Izzie's completion: \( -t + 3 \geq -5 \). This step is also correct.
-
Step 3: Izzie writes \( -t \geq -2 \). To isolate \( t \), you multiply or divide by -1, which reverses the inequality. So this step should become \( t \leq 2 \). This step is correct.
-
Step 4: She states \( t \leq 2 \). This is indeed the correct representation of the solution after considering the flipped inequality from Step 3.
Now let's evaluate the statements:
-
Izzie made a mistake going from step 1 to step 2: False. She did not make a mistake.
-
The correct answer should have been \( t \leq 8 \): False. The correct answer is \( t \leq 2 \).
-
Izzie made no mistakes in solving this inequality: True. She solved it correctly.
-
Izzie should not have changed the inequality symbol from \( \geq \) to \( \leq \): False. She appropriately changed the inequality when multiplying by -1.
-
Izzie made a mistake going from step 3 to step 4: False. There was no mistake in the transition from Step 3 to Step 4.
-
Izzie made a mistake going from step 2 to step 3: False. She did not make a mistake there.
Overall, Izzie's work is correct.