Asked by pj
                Explain the advangtages and disadvantages of vertical communication in an organization. Identify one advantage that you might encounter
            
            
        Answers
                    Answered by
            SraJMcGin
            
    You might begin  here:
(Broken Link Removed)
Sra
    
(Broken Link Removed)
Sra
                    Answered by
            Ms. Sue
            
    One advantage to vertical communication is that the employee always knows what the boss expects of him.  
    
                    Answered by
            PsyDAG
            
    Vertical communication usually goes from the top down, giving the advantage that Ms. Sue mentions. However, it depends on whether the communication includes both positive and negative comments. Subordinates need positive comments when they are deserved. With children, parents are urged to "catch them being good." In other words, praise them for their positive actions. The same applies to adults. Unfortunately, often superiors only communicate when something goes wrong.
Vertical communication from the bottom up is riskier, because of the power imbalance. Subordinates are taking risks in criticizing actions of their superiors to the superiors, so these criticisms usually remain at the subordinate's level rather than being communicated upward. Suggestion boxes allow upward criticisms to be made anonymously, reducing the fear of negative sanctions for the communication.
However, if subordinates believe changes need to be made by superiors, these changes will never be made unless their need is communicated upward. It is very rewarding for the subordinate, if the suggested change is implemented.
It helps if the superior has a policy encouraging upward communication of <I>both</I> positive and negative remarks. Of course, these remarks are more effective, if they are more specific, giving details of reasons for change and options in making the change. Just saying that something is wrong is ineffective.
I hope this helps a little more. Thanks for asking.
    
Vertical communication from the bottom up is riskier, because of the power imbalance. Subordinates are taking risks in criticizing actions of their superiors to the superiors, so these criticisms usually remain at the subordinate's level rather than being communicated upward. Suggestion boxes allow upward criticisms to be made anonymously, reducing the fear of negative sanctions for the communication.
However, if subordinates believe changes need to be made by superiors, these changes will never be made unless their need is communicated upward. It is very rewarding for the subordinate, if the suggested change is implemented.
It helps if the superior has a policy encouraging upward communication of <I>both</I> positive and negative remarks. Of course, these remarks are more effective, if they are more specific, giving details of reasons for change and options in making the change. Just saying that something is wrong is ineffective.
I hope this helps a little more. Thanks for asking.
                                                    There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
                                            
                Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.