Duplicate Question
The question on this page has been marked as a duplicate question.
Original Question
Professor Nostradamus conducted an empirical or observed communications study in his laboratory where he convincingly found a c...Asked by Audrey
Professor Nostradamus conducted an empirical or observed communications study in his laboratory where he convincingly found a connection between two variables.
The link concluded that Variable “X” always increased when the subject was exposed to Variable “Y”. By repeating the study over the course of several years he found the same results in his laboratory each time. What can he not say?
The link concluded that Variable “X” always increased when the subject was exposed to Variable “Y”. By repeating the study over the course of several years he found the same results in his laboratory each time. What can he not say?
Answers
Answered by
GuruBlue
What do YOU think he can not conclude based on logic? We will be happy to comment after we read your answer.
Answered by
Audrey
I would say that Professor Nostradamus would not be able to say that his model or theoretical simplified version representation of the real world is an explanatory device, although it can be used to play an important suggestive role in the formulation of his theory. Any thoughts?
Answered by
GuruBlue
You did not address the question...The questions does not say anything about a simplified version representation of the real world.
The question is saying - after years of testing in his laboratory, he has found a consistent connection between two variables... What can he NOT SAY... what is missing in his study?
The question is saying - after years of testing in his laboratory, he has found a consistent connection between two variables... What can he NOT SAY... what is missing in his study?
Answered by
Audrey
Can he not say that there isn't a connection between the two variables?
Answered by
GuruBlue
NO...he can't... the studies "in his laboratory" have shown a consistent contection.
Answered by
GuruBlue
What would have to be done to prove that the connection is consistent everywhere.
Answered by
Audrey
Further testing. But if he did the same test over and over, he concluded that others would get the same result. So could it be that others results might vary?
Answered by
GuruBlue
Yes, further testing...but there is one thing that can be done that would prove that the testing in "his lab" was valid....
Answered by
Audrey
The same tests under different conditions? Or using different subjects? I am lost on this one
Answered by
GuruBlue
RIGHT!!!! the tests have been consistent at HIS lab...to prove that his tests are valid , they would have to be done somewhere else by unbiased testers.... Then he could say that his tests were probably valid.
Answered by
Audrey
So he could not say his tests were vaild unless others could verify the results?
Answered by
GuruBlue
Absolutely!!!
Answered by
GuruBlue
If something is to be true, it has to be TRUE everywhere.
Answered by
Audrey
Thanks for all your help!
Answered by
GuruBlue
welcome entirely <G>
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.