All of the answer choices (A, B, C, and D) demonstrate how the use of fire might have affected human migration.
A. People could live in places that otherwise would have been too cold: The ability to control and harness fire would have allowed early humans to survive in colder climates which would have been uninhabitable without the warmth provided by fire. This would have potentially opened up new territories and regions for human settlement.
B. People could cook food and scare off dangerous animals: The ability to cook food would have provided early humans with a more varied and nutrient-rich diet. Furthermore, fire would have served as a deterrent, helping scare off dangerous animals and provide a sense of security, enabling humans to settle in areas that were previously considered too risky or dangerous.
C. People could settle in one place where it was easy to keep a fire burning: The ability to control and maintain fire would have allowed humans to settle in one place for longer periods. Rather than constantly moving in search of warmth and protection, they could establish permanent settlements centered around fires.
D. People could be less dependent on daylight and travel at night: With the use of fire, humans would have been able to extend their activities and travel beyond daylight hours. Fire would have provided light, warmth, and protection during the night, allowing for increased movement and exploration.
Therefore, all of these factors (A, B, C, and D) demonstrate how the use of fire would have affected human migration.
How might the use of fire have affected human migration?
A. People could live in places that otherwise would have been too cold.
B. People could cook food and scare off dangerous animals.
C. People could settle in one place where it was easy to keep a fire burning.
D. People could be less dependent on daylight and travel at night.
2 answers
choose one answer
1 answer