Asked by Praise
Using log tables evaluate 0.6283×17.85
Answers
Answered by
mathhelper
Wow, you still have log tables?
if you insist, but I will use my calculator and round the results to 4 decimals
since most of the log tables they had in the 60s and 70s had only 4 decimals
let x = 0.6283×17.85
log x = log(0.6283×17.85)
= log 0.6283 + log 17.85
= (-1 + .7982) + (1 + .2516) , I remembered all that mantissa stuff
= -.2018 + 1.2516
log x = 1.0498
x = 10^1.0498
I suppose you also had antilog tables
x = 10^1.0498
= 10^1 * 10^.0498 , find .0498 in the anti-log tables
= 10 * 1.12150
= 11.2150
if you insist, but I will use my calculator and round the results to 4 decimals
since most of the log tables they had in the 60s and 70s had only 4 decimals
let x = 0.6283×17.85
log x = log(0.6283×17.85)
= log 0.6283 + log 17.85
= (-1 + .7982) + (1 + .2516) , I remembered all that mantissa stuff
= -.2018 + 1.2516
log x = 1.0498
x = 10^1.0498
I suppose you also had antilog tables
x = 10^1.0498
= 10^1 * 10^.0498 , find .0498 in the anti-log tables
= 10 * 1.12150
= 11.2150
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.