Asked by James

G starts a fire that soon consumes Poor P's trailer. G did not know that the trailer was occupied and had no reason to know this, but it was. After rushing into the trailer to save her child, P is severely burned. P sues G in negligence. Assuming that G has breached a duty, what two arguments might he make in defense? Assume that the traditional negligence defenses apply. Will these arguments work here?
Answered by bobpursley
Look up ...
implied assumption of risk
contributory negligence
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!