Once you subtract \(10x\) from both sides of the equation, you have:
\[ 60 + 20x = 90 + 10x - 10x \]
This simplifies to:
\[ 60 + 20x = 90 \]
Now, you can further solve for \(x\) by isolating the variable.
Next, subtract 60 from both sides of the equation:
\[ 60 + 20x - 60 = 90 - 60 \]
This simplifies to:
\[ 20x = 30 \]
Now, divide both sides by 20 to solve for \(x\):
\[ x = \frac{30}{20} = \frac{3}{2} = 1.5 \]
However, this does not match the previously mentioned point of intersection (3, 120). Let's re-evaluate the equation:
Originally, you should have:
- \(60 + 20x = 90 + 10x\)
After subtracting \(10x\) from both sides, you get:
\[ 60 + 20x - 10x = 90 \]
This simplifies to:
\[ 60 + 10x = 90 \]
Next, subtract 60 from both sides:
\[ 10x = 90 - 60 \]
Now, this simplifies to:
\[ 10x = 30 \]
Finally, divide each side by 10:
\[ x = \frac{30}{10} = 3 \]
So, when \(x = 3\), they both bike the same number of miles.
Now, let's find the number of miles they bike after 3 weeks to confirm the y-coordinate:
For Zara:
\[ y = 60 + 20(3) = 60 + 60 = 120 \]
For Steven:
\[ y = 90 + 10(3) = 90 + 30 = 120 \]
Thus, the point of intersection is indeed \((3, 120)\), confirming your earlier conclusion.