Why was Leo frank's court case decision considered controversial?

Question

A. he was declared "not guilty," which angered many people.
B. he admitted to murdering Mary phagan, but he received only five years in prison.
C. The jury should have noted the faulty testimony, but possible anti-semitic views resulted a "guilty" verdict.
D. It ensured protection for different religious views, which was a challenge in the mostly-christian south.

Answer 1

C. The jury should have noted the faulty testimony, but possible anti-semitic views resulted in a "guilty" verdict.