When is judicial activism warranted by the Supreme Court?(1 point) Responses if there is a case where the court disagrees with a previous decision of the lower court if there is a case where the court disagrees with a previous decision of the lower court in any case that is appealed to it in any case that is appealed to it if a case is highly publicized in the media if a case is highly publicized in the media when there is a need to decide on constitutional issues

Answer 1

The correct answer is: when there is a need to decide on constitutional issues.

Judicial activism by the Supreme Court is warranted when there is a need to interpret the Constitution and clarify its application to contemporary issues. In these instances, the Court may engage in a more expansive interpretation of constitutional rights and principles, even if it means overturning previous decisions or deviating from the decisions of lower courts. The Court's role in protecting individual rights and liberties and ensuring equal justice under the law justifies judicial activism in cases involving constitutional issues.

Answer 2

It's A.