Which statement explains why a rubber band analogy is not a perfect comparison for bonds in a substance when considering phase changes?(1 point)ResponsesFor a phase change from solid to liquid, the bonds break completely and particles can move independently of each other.For a phase change from solid to liquid, the bonds break completely and particles can move independently of each other.For a phase change from liquid to gas, the bonds do not break completely and particles can still slide past each other.For a phase change from liquid to gas, the bonds do not break completely and particles can still slide past each other.For a phase change from solid to liquid, the bonds do not break completely and particles can still slide past each other.For a phase change from solid to liquid, the bonds do not break completely and particles can still slide past each other.For a phase change from liquid to gas, the bonds break completely and particles can move independently of each other.

1 answer

The statement that best explains why a rubber band analogy is not a perfect comparison for bonds in a substance when considering phase changes is:

For a phase change from solid to liquid, the bonds do not break completely and particles can still slide past each other.

This statement highlights that in a solid-to-liquid phase change (melting), the bonds do not completely break as they would in a rubber band analogy, and the particles are able to move more freely relative to each other, which is a key aspect of how liquids behave compared to solids.