Which statement explains why a rubber band analogy is not a perfect comparison for bonds in a

Question

substance when considering phase changes?(1 point)
For a phase change from solid to liquid, the bonds break completely and particles can move independently
of each other.
For a phase change from solid to liquid, the bonds do not break completely and particles can still slide past
each other.
For a phase change from liquid to gas, the bonds break completely and particles can move independently
of each other.
For a phase change from liquid to gas, the bonds do not break completely and particles can still slide past
each other.

Answer 1

The statement that best explains why a rubber band analogy is not a perfect comparison for bonds in a substance when considering phase changes is:

For a phase change from solid to liquid, the bonds do not break completely and particles can still slide past each other.

This statement highlights that in a phase change from solid to liquid, the intermolecular forces do not fully dissociate, allowing particles to retain some order and still move relative to one another, unlike the rubber band analogy which might imply a complete separation or a fully elastic recovery.