Which of the following statements best explains why the addition of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution might be dangerous? (1 point)

Question

• The Bill of Rights would limit the power of state governments.
• The Bill of Rights could be interpreted to transfer power to the states.
• The Bill of Rights could be interpreted to limit people to the listed rights.
• The Bill of Rights would limit the power of the national government.

Answer 1

The statement that best explains why the addition of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution might be considered dangerous is: "The Bill of Rights could be interpreted to limit people to the listed rights."

This perspective highlights the concern that explicitly enumerating certain rights might imply that any rights not listed are not protected, potentially reducing the scope of individual liberties.