Which of the following statements best explains why the addition of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution might be dangerous?(1 point)

Question

Responses

The Bill of Rights could be interpreted to transfer power to the states.
The Bill of Rights could be interpreted to transfer power to the states.

The Bill of Rights would limit the power of the national government.
The Bill of Rights would limit the power of the national government.

The Bill of Rights could be interpreted to limit people to the listed rights.
The Bill of Rights could be interpreted to limit people to the listed rights.

The Bill of Rights would limit the power of state governments.

Answer 1

The statement that best explains why the addition of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution might be considered dangerous is:

The Bill of Rights could be interpreted to limit people to the listed rights.

This concern arises from the idea that by enumerating specific rights, there might be an implication that any rights not explicitly listed are not protected, potentially leading to a narrow interpretation of individual freedoms.