Which of the following might be considered a valid source for online research? Select all that apply.

(2 points)
Responses

the National Archives
the National Archives

a weblog of a guy who describes himself as a “history nerd”
a weblog of a guy who describes himself as a “history nerd”

a Wikipedia article
a Wikipedia article

a weblog of a college history professor about her area of specialty
a weblog of a college history professor about her area of specialty

a org website that was last updated in 2008
a org website that was last updated in 2008

a com website with its own online store
a com website with its own online store

a gov website
a gov website

a website with claims that you can’t verify at another source
please put it in yes or no

1 answer

Sure! Here are the responses categorized as "Yes" (valid source) or "No" (not a valid source):

  1. the National Archives - Yes
  2. a weblog of a guy who describes himself as a “history nerd” - No
  3. a Wikipedia article - No (can be a starting point but not a reliable source)
  4. a weblog of a college history professor about her area of specialty - Yes
  5. a org website that was last updated in 2008 - No (age of information matters)
  6. a com website with its own online store - No (generally not a valid source unless it's a reputable company and the information is relevant)
  7. a gov website - Yes
  8. a website with claims that you can’t verify at another source - No

Valid sources: National Archives, weblog of a college history professor, gov website.