the National Archives
a weblog of a college history professor about her area of specialty
a gov website
Which of the following might be considered a valid source for online research? Select all that apply.
(2 points)
the National Archives
a weblog of a guy who describes himself as a “history nerd”
a Wikipedia article
a weblog of a college history professor about her area of specialty
a org website that was last updated in 2008
a com website with its own online store
a gov website
a website with claims that you can’t verify at another source
3 answers
the National Archives yes
a weblog of a guy who describes himself as a “history nerd” no
a Wikipedia article yes
a weblog of a college history professor about her area of specialty yes
a org website that was last updated in 2008 no
a com website with its own online store no
a gov websiteyes
a website with claims that you can’t verify at another source no
a weblog of a guy who describes himself as a “history nerd” no
a Wikipedia article yes
a weblog of a college history professor about her area of specialty yes
a org website that was last updated in 2008 no
a com website with its own online store no
a gov websiteyes
a website with claims that you can’t verify at another source no
Your revised answers are correct. The National Archives, a Wikipedia article, a weblog of a college history professor about her area of specialty, and a government website are all valid sources for online research. However, a weblog of a guy who describes himself as a "history nerd," a .org website that was last updated in 2008, a .com website with its own online store, and a website with unverifiable claims are not considered reliable sources for research.