Which of the following is not a true statement.(1 point) Responses The plaintiff must show that the defendant owed a duty of care The plaintiff must show that the defendant owed a duty of care The plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant breached that duty The plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant breached that duty The plaintiff must show proximate cause-tht the injury happened as a result of that breach of duty The plaintiff must show proximate cause-tht the injury happened as a result of that breach of duty

Answer 1

The provided statements seem to be repetitive, with each one essentially restating the same legal principles related to a negligence claim.

To clarify, in a negligence case, the plaintiff must show the following elements:

1. The defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff.
2. The defendant breached that duty.
3. There is proximate cause linking the breach to the injury suffered by the plaintiff.
4. The plaintiff suffered actual damages as a result.

Since all statements are essentially outlining parts of the negligence claim structure, none of them are clearly false. However, if the question intends for you to identify a potential redundancy or misleading aspect, you could argue that the repetition of similar statements may lead one to think they are different, when they are not.

If you need a specific statement to identify as "not true" based on context or formatting, please clarify or provide further details.