Which of the following explains the difference between a treaty and an executive agreement?(1 point)

Question

Responses

A treaty is used by a president to make an agreement with another nation, while an executive agreement is part of a negotiation with Congress
A treaty is used by a president to make an agreement with another nation, while an executive agreement is part of a negotiation with Congress

A treaty must be ratified by a two-thirds vote of the Senate, while an executive agreement does not.
A treaty must be ratified by a two-thirds vote of the Senate, while an executive agreement does not.

Treaties involve agreements with other nations that must be accepted by the House of Representatives, while executive agreements must be accepted by the Supreme Court.
Treaties involve agreements with other nations that must be accepted by the House of Representatives, while executive agreements must be accepted by the Supreme Court.

A treaty is only used to end wars, while executive agreements can involve other topics.

Answer 1

The correct response is:

A treaty must be ratified by a two-thirds vote of the Senate, while an executive agreement does not.

This option accurately reflects the main difference between a treaty and an executive agreement in U.S. law. Treaties require Senate approval, while executive agreements can be made by the president without the need for Congressional approval.