Which of the following explains the difference between a treaty and an executive agreement?(1 point) Responses Treaties involve agreements with other nations that must be accepted by the House of Representatives, while executive agreements must be accepted by the Supreme Court. Treaties involve agreements with other nations that must be accepted by the House of Representatives, while executive agreements must be accepted by the Supreme Court. A treaty is used by a president to make an agreement with another nation, while an executive agreement is part of a negotiation with Congress A treaty is used by a president to make an agreement with another nation, while an executive agreement is part of a negotiation with Congress A treaty is only used to end wars, while executive agreements can involve other topics. A treaty is only used to end wars, while executive agreements can involve other topics. A treaty must be ratified by a two-thirds vote of the Senate, while an executive agreement does not. A treaty must be ratified by a two-thirds vote of the Senate, while an executive agreement does not.

Answer 1

The correct response is: A treaty must be ratified by a two-thirds vote of the Senate, while an executive agreement does not.

This accurately describes the primary distinction between treaties and executive agreements in terms of the legislative process involved in their approval. Treaties require a higher level of consensus from the Senate, while executive agreements can be made by the President without such formal legislative approval.