Question
Which of the following best summarizes the logic used by the Anti-Federalists to argue against a single large republic? (1 point)
• A single large republic will best represent and protect the interests of the states.
• A single large republic will make direct citizen participation easier.
• A single large republic will make controlling factions easier.
A single large republic will make it difficult if not impossible to represent the views of the
• A single large republic will best represent and protect the interests of the states.
• A single large republic will make direct citizen participation easier.
• A single large republic will make controlling factions easier.
A single large republic will make it difficult if not impossible to represent the views of the
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The best summary of the Anti-Federalists' logic against a single large republic is: **A single large republic will make it difficult if not impossible to represent the views of the people.**
Anti-Federalists argued that a large republic would lead to the interests of diverse populations being overlooked, making it harder for citizens to have a meaningful say in their government and for representatives to accurately reflect the views of their constituents.
Anti-Federalists argued that a large republic would lead to the interests of diverse populations being overlooked, making it harder for citizens to have a meaningful say in their government and for representatives to accurately reflect the views of their constituents.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.