Which of the following best summarizes the logic used by the Anti-Federalists to argue against a single large republic? (1 point)

Question

• A single large republic will best represent and protect the interests of the states.
• A single large republic will make direct citizen participation easier.
• A single large republic will make controlling factions easier.
A single large republic will make it difficult if not impossible to represent the views of the

Answer 1

The best summary of the Anti-Federalists' logic against a single large republic is: A single large republic will make it difficult if not impossible to represent the views of the people.

Anti-Federalists argued that a large republic would lead to the interests of diverse populations being overlooked, making it harder for citizens to have a meaningful say in their government and for representatives to accurately reflect the views of their constituents.